Skip to main content

The Middle East Embassy Attacks


On 9/11 we saw a number of attacks on US embassies in the Middle East. Specifically we were attacked in Egypt and Libya. The attack in Libya killed our ambassador and 3 other embassy staff. Today we now have more attacks on our embassies around the Middle East Yemen, Tanzania, Cairo and others.

 

I like many Americans am frustrated and unhappy. Here are some thoughts to ponder:

 

It seems very likely the attack in Libya was not an angry mob. Confirmation is coming out of Egypt today from one of its ministers saying these attacks were carefully planned and executed using the angry mobs and the reaction to the anti-Muslim video as cover. The pictures of the embassy in Libya clearly show that this attack used weapons that a typical angry group of protestors would not have. The FBI is investigating and hopefully we will learn the truth.

 

I dont believe this was a coincidence that it happened on the 11th anniversary of 9/11. Here is why Supposedly this offensive YouTube video was made in early July and posted. Why did the video take over 2 months to get noticed? The entire purpose of YouTube is to be able to share video immediately worldwide. So if this video was out there since July we are expected to believe that millions of Muslims in the Middle East never saw it and reacted till 9/11/12? Clearly this was planned and the coincidence is not believable.

 

Nearly as alarming is the fact that the White House does not see this or at least does not want to admit it. I understand they need to gather all the facts first but why are we in the interim apologizing for the video? The US government did not create, distribute or condone the video. The American people did not even care about it as is evidenced in the extremely small number of hits it had from July to September.

 

America should not apologize for freedom of speech - ever. The person (s) who did the video are misguided bigots who clearly wanted to insult the Muslims. Just the way the Muslims have desecrated our flag to insult us. Two wrongs dont ever make a right. These bigots however, are within their rights under our US constitution.

 

A silly insulting video does not equal riots, destruction and murder. I dont think that the majority of Muslims around the world would ever react to a stupid video this way. So this obviously was an orchestrated event using the video as a catalyst to spur a series of riots that would cover a direct terrorist attack on our embassy in Libya. Lets hope the FBI can prove this through their investigation. In the meantime we pray for the families of the dead heroes and hope that the new Libyan government works tirelessly to bring the responsible terrorists to justice.

 

Of great concern is the debate raging in the US about the Presidents actions around this attack and equally, the comments made by Mitt Romney yesterday. I am confused about why Mitt Romney is being attacked by the press for saying that the US government should never apologize for freedom of speech? He is correct on this point and the Tweet from the embassy in Cairo just as the protests were happening was ill advised and hurt the US. The fact that later the White House too disavowed the embassy Tweets shows that Romney was right.

 

Mitt was however, wrong in criticizing the government while the attacks were happening. Yes his timing was off. However, of much greater concern are the Presidents actions. His lack of emotion about the death of a US ambassador was evident and disappointing. He seemed more concerned about apologizing for the intolerance of the video than condemning the violence. Granted that is just my opinion.

 

Where I think the American people should be deeply concerned is that he cancelled his daily intelligence briefing and kept his campaign trip to Vegas while US embassies were still under attack. How can he justify going to Vegas for a fund raiser when this issue was still unfolding? I think this speaks to his character and focus. Would Regan or Bush have done that?

 

As a reminder a US Embassy is considered US soil no matter what country it is in. It is the responsibility of the host nation to protect it and treat it as such. We take this very seriously in US and certainly have protected all that are on our soil. That said it is also the responsibility of the embassy to have appropriate security as well.

 

Why did the embassy in Libya not have Marine protection? We are being told that the Libyan embassy had a Lock and Key system. While we know that one of the people killed with the ambassador was a security officer and ex-Navy Seal, it seems ridiculous that he was the only line of defense. This embassy was already attacked once before and yet on the anniversary of 9/11 we had our ambassador there and had no marine detail? How could we be that naive? What was the administration thinking? A violent nation, with a new government, formed through violent revolution and on 9/11 we have no guards at our embassy? This is clearly a sad lack of focus. The administration must be held to answer for this.

 

Beyond these sad facts and disturbing realities in broader terms we should be discussing globally what it is that makes radicals respond this way? Why can't their governments control them? Why do they hate the US as much as they do? Where is their sense of decency and humanity? Why are they ignoring the very teachings of the Koran?

 

The sad fundamental issue here is the radical Muslims don't believe in freedom of speech and we do. I respect their religion and their right to limit speech but only in their country. Not in this US and not in the world. These radicals and many liberals need to understand that they can't force their beliefs on others no matter how strongly they believe them. The US is a sovereign nation and as such is entitled to its beliefs and Constitution. If you dont like what we believe in then just dont come here, dont trade with us, dont accept our aid and dont ask for our help when you are being attacked. Heck, dont allow us to have an embassy in your country I am sure we would be fine with that. I know I would.

 

There is no excuse for what they have done in the past two days. These radicals are savages with no moral limits and sadly the only thing they understand is force. This is a tragedy as so many non radical Muslims don't behave this way. However, the radicals hold the power it seems and use religion to get many Muslims to behave outside their own beliefs.

 

There are thousands of folks demonstrating/attacking our embassies today in the Middle East. Are all of them radicals? Or are many of them brain washed and operating out of some sense of fear and religious obligation? If all these people are actually radicals with no moral boundaries then why are we in their countries? What can we possibly want with people who act this way? There can be nothing we want that badly that we lower our standards to work with such cultures. Why don't we just leave?

 

I often ask the question - what is so strategic about the Middle East? Oil? I think this is a misnomer. You see they need to sell their oil and the US is the heaviest consumer of the black gold on the planet. So in effect they need us as bad as we need them. Also if we would just drill some of our own we could avoid dealing with them even more. Sure we have some allies there but few. Israel is really the only long term ally and our President is trying to destroy that relationship as we speak. His recent actions toward President Mubarik are definately of concern.

 

Here is what I think we should close all the embassies under attack immediately. We should get all our people out hopefully with the protection of the host countries but if not with our own military. We should refuse to go back to these countries unless there is a real national interest at stake and we can get assurance from the host country they can protect our citizens.

 

It is time we gently but forcefully tell these enemies we will not take anymore. We are not going to attack you (we are above that) but we will cease all trade and diplomatic relations. Let them try those economic realities on for a while.

 

We cannot condone violent savagery not matter what religious motivation is behind it. Terrorism is terrorism not matter how you dress it up (lipstick on a pig) and we should not tolerate it under any circumstances. Come on America lets stand up for what we believe in and put aside any political differences we have internally. Show the world who we are and what we stand for. We will never be respected if we wavier on our morals and principles. Lets stop this nonsense now!

Popular posts from this blog

Porsche Perspective

Before I start I must declare that I am a Ferrari owner, racer and lover. As such Porsche is normally an arch enemy. Most of the faithful from each camp very rarely see eye to eye and often avoid each other like the plague. So for me to write this piece on Porsche is a stretch and proves once and for all, above all I am just a true lover of all cars! Porsche has to be respected for their longevity, their racing prowess and their myopic market focus. Porsche's have been racing and winning for as long as I can remember and while they are not a Ferrari their racing pedigree is remarkable. Initially their claim to fame was the basic 911. This is still their bread and butter car and over the decades has been improved markedly. But I am not going to focus on the 911, the Panamera or Cayenne. Today I want to discuss the smaller, younger cousins - the Cayman and the Boxster. These two "entry level" Porsches are worth writing about. Porsche first made the Boxster in 1997 in an

New Cars - Choosing the Best

Well it appears that my blogs about cars are as popular as my ramblings about the economy and politics. Who knew? Today I want to focus on New Cars but specifically on Audi. For those that are old like me you remember that Audi had some issues in the mid 1980's with "unintended acceleration". While they were producing fine cars with fair value they were no where near the power and strength of either BMW or Benz. However prior to 1986 they were trucking along pretty well and gaining some market share. I was one of their buyers, taking home a brand new 5000S. This was a nice 4 door sedan with Quattro (all wheel drive) and a unique 5 cylinder engine. It was by no means fast but it was solid and spacious. I liked its look and my wife liked the space for two young kids plus the safety features. It was priced below the other two big German luxury car makers and so we had our first Audi. Then the big scare came with the "unintended acceleration" scandal. This sin

Welcome to Ambushing Reality

After nearly 11 months of writing this blog I have been "prodded/convinced" to start a podcast. Below is the Welcome and introduction. I will upload the first few episodes shortly. Please tell your friends and let me know what you think. Welcome to Ambushing Reality