Skip to main content

Tax Returns & the Truth


We are being bombarded with stories about the Mitt Romney tax returns. The left thinks he is hiding something and wants him to disclose 10 years of returns (recently amended to 5 years) so they can dig into them and find ways to make his wealth an issue in this election. While it appears all is fair game in politics I think the American people would prefer to hear about who is going to fix the economy and get jobs back on track.

That said all the debate about tax returns made me start thinking and now I have some questions. Mitt Romney paid over 13% in taxes in his 2010 return and claims that is the case for all years. His 2011 return will be out in September and we will see what that year yielded. Barrack Obama paid 20% in his latest tax filing according to public records. All this got me thinking.

I made less money than both of them in 2011 and I paid about 44% in taxes. Is there a problem here? How can they both pay so little on large sums of income and I, a poor working stiff have to pay more than double what they did?

So I did some analysis. In Romney’s case most of his income came from capital gains, which is taxed at a lower rate (at least for now) than regular income. In 2010 that rate was 15% on long term gains. He had a gross income of $21.6M and deductions of over $4.5M and like Obama had some miscellaneous items, leaving him with a tax due of $3.09M. Since he paid in over $4.6M he got a refund of $1.6M. With the legal use of tax shelters, deductions and careful investment management he managed to get his gross rate to just over 21%. I get that and while I don’t think it is fair I can see how under current tax law it is possible.

Obama made a salary of $394K and then had approximately $444K income from his and Michelle’s books etc. Their return shows gross income of $844K with taxable being $789K the difference being self- employment retirement deduction. How did he do that? He is not self- employed? Then he has deductions of over $278K and few miscellaneous items leaving him with a tax due of $162K and since he paid in $186K he got a $24K refund. So in effect his gross tax rate was 19.1%.

The press is reporting different numbers because some are using net taxable income over tax due while others are using gross income over tax due. I think the best measure is gross income versus tax due (which is what I used above). Please note that Romney paid a higher percentage than Obama and of course a lot more money. Neither violated any tax laws and used every available deduction they could. Romney had a very complex stream of income and since he is self-employed more deductions. Romney is a very wealthy man and there is no shame in that. Actually, he gave over $2.9M away in 2010 which is just over 13% of his gross income. The Obama’s gave away $172K which is about 20% of their gross income.

Based on this analysis and the details outlined above I just can’t see why there is such an outcry about tax returns. We will see Romney’s 2011 statement very soon and I am sure it will once again be similar to 2010 as most of his income comes from investments. His expenses (deductions) maybe higher in 2011 because he started his campaign and they are not cheap to run.

If we have any concerns about the tax returns it should be that simple folks like us who don’t have high powered CPA’s and attorneys don’t have the deductions these folks have a pay a much higher tax rate than they do. I am a perfect example. If our leaders can make use of the tax code and pay this little why can’t we?

We can’t because we don’t have the means to hire the experts to guide us and thus we don’t get the deductions. This is why I am in favor of a flat tax as we will level the playing field and even simple hard working stiffs like me will get a fair shake on their taxes. This is what the media should be focused on. This is the kind of change we need to get America back on her feet. Who cares whether Barrack paid 19 or 22% or whether Romney paid less or more? We should care about what we are being asked to pay and why 43% of Americans pay no taxes at all!

So let’s knock off the tax return rhetoric and get after the big issues.

See my new series: Fixing America – A Road Map to Restoring the American Dream. A ten part plan to Fix America – continuing right here on RastaRants.

Popular posts from this blog

Porsche Perspective

Before I start I must declare that I am a Ferrari owner, racer and lover. As such Porsche is normally an arch enemy. Most of the faithful from each camp very rarely see eye to eye and often avoid each other like the plague. So for me to write this piece on Porsche is a stretch and proves once and for all, above all I am just a true lover of all cars! Porsche has to be respected for their longevity, their racing prowess and their myopic market focus. Porsche's have been racing and winning for as long as I can remember and while they are not a Ferrari their racing pedigree is remarkable. Initially their claim to fame was the basic 911. This is still their bread and butter car and over the decades has been improved markedly. But I am not going to focus on the 911, the Panamera or Cayenne. Today I want to discuss the smaller, younger cousins - the Cayman and the Boxster. These two "entry level" Porsches are worth writing about. Porsche first made the Boxster in 1997 in an...
Read more

Energy Policy in America

Energy Policy in America Well it appears that we are at another critical crossroad with economic policy in America. Our President has decided that moving America to alternate green fuels is worth the potential economic downturn that could result from this short term strategy. America definitely needs to diversify its energy use. No one on either side of the aisle would argue that point, however, the process and timing of such a diversification are critical to our economic recovery. We must do 2 things over the next decade with our energy policy if we are to maintain a position as the leading economy in the world. One we must become less dependent on foreign resources and two we must diversify our energy use. It seems apparent that we have tremendous oil and coal resources in our country that we are not utilizing. I feel this is a starting point. How much energy utilization can we switch from foreign oil to our own resources over what period of time? At the same time what...
Read more