Skip to main content

Sequestration

Well we are facing another fiscal "emergency" on Friday according to the President. March 1st we will have Sequestration. What a strange word. Who chose that word i wonder?

The technical definition of it is to segregate or separate. We for example sequester a jury during trial sometimes. The word was first used in the 15th century and comes from the Latin word "sequestrare" which means to hand over to a trustee.

Why would we use this term to define a decrease in an increase in spending? It seems to be an absolute miss in definition. Is the government trying to confuse the populous? The GOP claims the Democrats specifically the President and his staff came up with it. The President is claiming that all parties agreed to it. Who is right?

WHO CARES!

I am an independent so care for neither established party but it seems to me that they are acting like school kids blaming each other. Do we ever think about what we look like to the rest of the world? Do we care? Terrorists don't need to fear us because we can't agree on anything and we can't even use our own language correctly. This is a sad day in America.

So here is where we are in the stand off:

The President says that if the sequester goes through the economy is in trouble and so are many citizens. He claims we will see long lines at airports, slow response to accidents, possible bad beef and other food, and much more. He paints a picture that makes it sound like we are going to fall off a cliff. Actually the White House said today that we would be cutting millions from an Intelligence agency that ceased to exist years ago? additionally if you add up all the cuts in spending the President says we are going to make with the sequester it is not $85 billion of 1.5% of our national budget but closer to $850 billion? The math does not work. What is the President doing? Trying to scare folks? Why?

The Republicans for their part claim that the House has passed 2 bills addressing the sequester and the Senate will not pick up either. Speaker Bohener today said that the Senate needs to "get off its ass and pass a bill". The Senate it seems has a bill but it includes additional taxes or increased revenue, depending on what vernacular you want to use. Since the President just bullied the Congress into a $600 billion tax hike plus a payroll tax increase, the Republicans are saying enough. Is it enough? Should we take more from the wealthy to fund all the social programs the President wants? Some think we should.

I think the American people are confused and this time I lay the blame at the Presidents feet primarily. Here is the truth:

The Sequester calls for $85 billion in cuts to the increases planned in the budget for 2013. It does NOT decrease government spending! We will SPEND MORE this year than last year even if the cuts go into place March 1st. Let me repeat we will spend more - just not as much more as the president wants. We are NOT CUTTING SPENDING, just the increase in spending.

here is an example. In my house we spent $425 a month on a vehicle last year. This year we were planning on spending a $500 a month on a vehicle. The increase of $75 a month. We agreed that this would only be possible if we got a favorable tax refund. (our Sequester if you will). So if we don't we won't be taking the bus or walking to work - we will just have to live with a car for $425 a month. The same is true for this budget sequester. No services will stop, no one will die and we can function within the current budget terms. Sure I'd like to see the military get the increases they planned on and the same for the TSA but we just can't afford it.

We are currently looking at spending more than $1 trillion dollars than we take in through taxes etc. That is a huge deficit and we can't last very long doing that. Our debt burden is closing in on $17 trillion and we want to spend more? Are our leaders nuts? The world economy is tenuous at best, our recovery (if you can call it a recovery) is shakier than the Harlem Shuffle and our debt rating is on the verge of going down again.

So everyone regardless of political party needs to step up. We are America - lets show the world that we are responsible and mature. lets demand a balanced budget and get our fiscal house in order. If you are not motivated by national pride then do it for your kids and grand kids. I don't care what your motivation is but find it and send our Congress and the president a message - "stop bickering, cut spending and get us a balanced budget". Come on people put politics aside an do the right thing!

And I don't want to hear about all the bad things that will happen to folks if we don't spend more. I know and we should have thought of that when we went crazy and developed the current expenditure model. Yes it will be tough and yes it will be tougher on some than others but guess what that is Democracy! We are not a socialist society and not everyone is entitled to same things - get over it. I want to drive a new 458 Ferrari but i can't afford more than a Nissan. I understand whats its like to have something and then loose it but like good Americans we adjust and move on. We get knocked down in life a lot but what defines us is how we get back up and fight another day - not how much we whine and demand that the wealthy take care of us. Need I remind you that we did that once before in this country it was called slavery! I don't want that so lets stand up and do what is right and lets do it right NOW!

Popular posts from this blog

Porsche Perspective

Before I start I must declare that I am a Ferrari owner, racer and lover. As such Porsche is normally an arch enemy. Most of the faithful from each camp very rarely see eye to eye and often avoid each other like the plague. So for me to write this piece on Porsche is a stretch and proves once and for all, above all I am just a true lover of all cars! Porsche has to be respected for their longevity, their racing prowess and their myopic market focus. Porsche's have been racing and winning for as long as I can remember and while they are not a Ferrari their racing pedigree is remarkable. Initially their claim to fame was the basic 911. This is still their bread and butter car and over the decades has been improved markedly. But I am not going to focus on the 911, the Panamera or Cayenne. Today I want to discuss the smaller, younger cousins - the Cayman and the Boxster. These two "entry level" Porsches are worth writing about. Porsche first made the Boxster in 1997 in an...

A Few Post Election Thoughts

Well the big election is over. I have been sick with the flu so delayed in my comments. Obama will be our President for another four years and the House and Senate are still divided. In short nothing has changed – or has it? Clearly Obama has learned nothing from the election and shows no signs of changing anything. And truthfully why should he? He is a lame duck President and has a specific agenda he wants to accomplish and he will. Nothing anyone did or said in the first term deterred him in anyway so why should he change now? He won by a big margin; the women and Latinos love him and who cares if he drives the economy down. After all the only people bitching in the US are the darn rich Republicans. Has Congress learned anything from the election? I doubt it. The Senate will shoot down everything that comes from the House and the only things they will try to shove through the House will be entitlements and increased taxes on the “rich”. I don’t see any miraculous bipartisani...

Tax Returns & the Truth

We are being bombarded with stories about the Mitt Romney tax returns. The left thinks he is hiding something and wants him to disclose 10 years of returns (recently amended to 5 years) so they can dig into them and find ways to make his wealth an issue in this election. While it appears all is fair game in politics I think the American people would prefer to hear about who is going to fix the economy and get jobs back on track. That said all the debate about tax returns made me start thinking and now I have some questions. Mitt Romney paid over 13% in taxes in his 2010 return and claims that is the case for all years. His 2011 return will be out in September and we will see what that year yielded. Barrack Obama paid 20% in his latest tax filing according to public records. All this got me thinking. I made less money than both of them in 2011 and I paid about 44% in taxes. Is there a problem here? How can they both pay so little on large sums of income and I, a poor working ...