Skip to main content

Clarity on Obamacare

The press has been on fire over Obamacare. I feel so sorry for all the millions of folks out there that do not understand insurance. I guess this is one time I can say I am blessed to have been in the health insurance business for 35 years. (we in the industry are usually running for cover as we are criticized constantly).

Let me try clarify a few things about Obamacare. First there is all this noise about the President lying to America by saying we could keep the coverage we had. So what - this isn't his first lie. You got to keep what you had till essential benefits were decided in each state and then the insurance companies were forced to change your policy to comply or terminate it. If you had a limited benefit plan at a lower costs, chances are you are going to get a cancelation notice.

Here is why. Insurers based the price of a policy on many factors but the biggest is the plan design. If a policy limits what it pays then it will be cheaper. Since Obamacare forced essential benefits and most states used high end plans as their benchmarks, the new policy coverage minimums are now very rich. These big benefits cost much more and thus insurers take the safe route and terminate the old policies rather than take the heat of the press and regulators if they were to price the new revised essential benefit plan for current customers (with huge rate increases). Sad we have to come to this but...

So what can one do? Well, the good news is that with Obamacare there is no longer (1/1/14) any pre-existing condition limitation nor can anyone be denied coverage if they have a serious illness. The bad news is that since the new essential benefit plans are so rich and the insurers must take all comers with no limits, the cost are very high. In short, we got exactly what the majority asked for - rich benefits, no pre-existing limitations, guarantee issue and tons of new taxes. Are you happy now?

The surprise is that even the liberal folks who voted and supported this are now angry because they are seeing the costs. Well welcome to my world. Nothing is free and the more you get the more you pay. I hope that folks are learning a hard lesson from this and will let their votes count in the 2014 elections.

I always felt this program had major issues and sure enough it does. I did not expect the technology to be the first. You would think that with a program this big they would be double sure that all the tech worked flawlessly before they launched. I guess it is just another example of how the administration really feels about the citizens - they don't care! Now there is a mad scramble to fix the web tools and of course all the corporate hot shots want in so they can claim they saved the day -typical!. The tech will be fixed soon but damage has been done.

What to expect now? Well once the web tools are functioning as they should there will be a mad rush to enroll for 1/1/14. However the rush will be smaller than predicted because all those that have coverage now and can't qualify for a subsidy are going to sit this one out. I know I would. There will be thousands, maybe millions, who are going to qualify for subsidies and they will enroll - just like in Massachusetts. The individual penalty is not big enough to drive the folks with a choice to move now so they will just sit and watch.

Once we get past this onslaught then the real problems will begin. As the millions get added to the insured rolls they will want to use their coverage (as they should). When they try to go to a provider and find they have to wait for extended periods, the real bitching will start. And this time it will be from the poorest Democrats. You see we already have a physician shortage in the primary care specialty area. Add all these new patients and the system will slow considerably. Folks will have to wait weeks and months to see a doc. Testing will suffer as well as surgeries. We will start to rival Canada and Europe for waiting times.

What a mess and sadly one we could have all avoided. However, as my Jamaican nanny used to say, "if you can't hear you must feel". And we sure are going to feel - buckle up its going to be a rough ride.

Popular posts from this blog

Porsche Perspective

Before I start I must declare that I am a Ferrari owner, racer and lover. As such Porsche is normally an arch enemy. Most of the faithful from each camp very rarely see eye to eye and often avoid each other like the plague. So for me to write this piece on Porsche is a stretch and proves once and for all, above all I am just a true lover of all cars! Porsche has to be respected for their longevity, their racing prowess and their myopic market focus. Porsche's have been racing and winning for as long as I can remember and while they are not a Ferrari their racing pedigree is remarkable. Initially their claim to fame was the basic 911. This is still their bread and butter car and over the decades has been improved markedly. But I am not going to focus on the 911, the Panamera or Cayenne. Today I want to discuss the smaller, younger cousins - the Cayman and the Boxster. These two "entry level" Porsches are worth writing about. Porsche first made the Boxster in 1997 in an...

Tax Returns & the Truth

We are being bombarded with stories about the Mitt Romney tax returns. The left thinks he is hiding something and wants him to disclose 10 years of returns (recently amended to 5 years) so they can dig into them and find ways to make his wealth an issue in this election. While it appears all is fair game in politics I think the American people would prefer to hear about who is going to fix the economy and get jobs back on track. That said all the debate about tax returns made me start thinking and now I have some questions. Mitt Romney paid over 13% in taxes in his 2010 return and claims that is the case for all years. His 2011 return will be out in September and we will see what that year yielded. Barrack Obama paid 20% in his latest tax filing according to public records. All this got me thinking. I made less money than both of them in 2011 and I paid about 44% in taxes. Is there a problem here? How can they both pay so little on large sums of income and I, a poor working ...

Energy Policy in America

Energy Policy in America Well it appears that we are at another critical crossroad with economic policy in America. Our President has decided that moving America to alternate green fuels is worth the potential economic downturn that could result from this short term strategy. America definitely needs to diversify its energy use. No one on either side of the aisle would argue that point, however, the process and timing of such a diversification are critical to our economic recovery. We must do 2 things over the next decade with our energy policy if we are to maintain a position as the leading economy in the world. One we must become less dependent on foreign resources and two we must diversify our energy use. It seems apparent that we have tremendous oil and coal resources in our country that we are not utilizing. I feel this is a starting point. How much energy utilization can we switch from foreign oil to our own resources over what period of time? At the same time what...